When Keri first posted the request for a guest blogger, I raised my hand thinking this should be a piece of cake. Keri suggested that I write about literature/writing that I was passionate about.
I read and write all sorts of blogs, short stories, poems and books, so writing about one of those books or authors should not be too difficult or so I thought.
You know where this is going, right?
So, I started writing. I wrote a few lines about the books I was reading - "Ulysses" by James Joyce, "Doubt" and "The Happiness Myth" by Jennifer Hecht and "After Virtue" by Alasdair McIntyre - and gave up half way. Then, I started writing a story about myself and how the protagonist (me!!) got into reading since his childhood and how Oscar Wilde was the bee’s knees etc., That fizzled out after way too much browsing on Facebook, Twitter and Quora.
Yep, I spend a considerable amount of time on Facebook, Twitter and Quora. Why? Well, all of my consuming happens at those places. People, their thoughts, feelings, questions, struggles, ideas, joy etc., - all of those things are there for everyone to see. I immerse myself in that in search of ideas for my poems, stories or even my paintings at times. Sometimes, I am just there to converse with friends. So, it is not a waste of time for me in any way. But then, I had to write this blog post, when lots of other interesting things were there to distract me. So, I pulled myself away once again.
I trashed all of the earlier drafts and decided to write about the three books that had inspired me and influenced me over the years - "Nightfall" by Isaac Asimov & Robert Silverberg, "The Portrait of Dorian Gray" by Oscar Wilde and "Being and Nothingness" by Jean-Paul Sartre.
Why those three books?
"Nightfall" is an easy read. It is set in an alternate universe, uses current scientific knowledge from our universe and juxtaposes it with religion. The result is quite interesting and refreshing. I like this book, because the subject matter resonates with what I believe, how I look at things and what I think of things around me.
"The Portrait of Dorian Gray" is almost perfect, in it's writing, in the portrayal of the characters and the pace at which the story flows. This is my favourite book and I keep returning to it to read random pages and the wisdom proffered by Lord Henry. There is a certain beauty to the words that come out of Lord Henry, which I like a lot. Even the preface to the book has beautiful words.
"Nightfall" and "The Portrait of Dorian Gray" are easy to read and easy to understand. "Being and Nothingness" on the other hand is neither easy to read, nor to understand. I myself haven't finished the book, but I keep reading random chapters every once in a while, especially when I can focus and have no other distractions. When I am focussed, the book is easy to read, understand and the profundity, mind-blowing.
Then, as I was reading some of the posts on the Quill Café blog, I came across Sydnee's latest post about
referencing reality and what was good and bad about it. She wrote a good summary at the end of that post. To that, I commented that I usually reference a lot of real life events, people and objects in my stories and referenced Ernest Hemingway in that comment. I don't think Sydnee's summary and Ernest Hemingway's quote were entirely related, but I thought it made sense there.
What was the Ernest Hemingway reference you ask? In the movie "Midnight in Paris", Ernest Hemingway says this -
"No subject is terrible if the story is true, if the prose is clean and honest, and if it affirms courage and grace under pressure."
So, here I am writing about what I've gone through the last four days (or is it five?) to come up with this blog post. I am unsure if I am affirming courage and grace here or if the prose is clean, but I can at least say I am being honest.
The post so far contains all of the little bits that I wanted in all of the original drafts. Win-Win so far, I think.
I consume a lot i.e. read, watch, talk and listen. And whatever I consume, including the conversations I have with my friends and strangers, make it into my short stories, haikus or poems.
I do change the names, locations etc., but I try to capture the conversation, the theme or the atmosphere as I remember it.
All the stories I write have some real life event incorporated into them, as I usually use the "stream of consciousness" style of writing and it does wonders for me.
And for that very reason, I like James Joyce' writing style in "Ulysses", even though I don't always seem to follow the story.
I love the fact that the story or the writing seems so absurd at times. I enjoy it. I think a lot of the prose these days is just so very clean, very structured, grammatically perfect and almost always follows the same style. The uniqueness, if any, is in how much detail there is about the characters, the environment etc., But otherwise, the prose is just boring. I hate that. There is so much structure, I keep wondering what's unique or creative about that.
So, reading "Ulysses" was like a breath of fresh air. The prose meanders and at times, the details don't appear to make any sense. But, as you read through the story, the pieces started falling into place, like a jigsaw puzzle. The story is bizarre, and yet it pulls you in. And that is what any good story should do - engage the reader, in any which way possible, in new ways.
That is what I try to do with my writing. I try different approaches when writing every new story and in the process learn a bit, learn what the readers like, which further helps me when I write. It is an iterative process. Of course, there is the possibility that I might eventually follow some structure. So far, that hasn't happened and I like how my stories, haikus and poems turn out.
Did you notice how this blog post talked about so many little things? It probably does not make a lot of sense or perhaps it does. But, this is how I like to write and try to keep the writing as honest as possible.
I hope I can see more folks pushing the envelope in all sorts of different directions in their writing.
This has been the most writing I have done in a long time and should help me get back on my figurative horse.
Thank you Keri for passing me the megaphone.
Sid Carter is a prolific profligate and a hedonist. He likes and loves all things and is wistful and happy. He can be reached by email or on twitter. Check out his website: http://shorts.sidcarter.com/